Aqua Marine vs. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 stay application within two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE Dxy JUDGE
WP(C).No. 8039 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 12.02.2019 EXHIBIT P2OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED AGAINST EXT. P1 ORDER EXHIBIT P3OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT. P2 APPEAL.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.