Best Hardwares vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 stay application within two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE Dxy JUDGE
WP(C).No. 8012 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32081300335/2013-14 DATED 14.01.2019. EXHIBIT P2OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN FORM NO.29 DATED 05.03.2019. EXHIBIT P3OF THE STAY PETITION IN FORM.NO.30 DATED 05.03.2019.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.