Kalliyath Sanitations vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of State Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T Abdul Rehim, J: The petitioner in W.P (C) No.18630/2018 is the appellant, challenging the judgment dated 24-01-2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition.
Challenge in the writ petition was against Ext.P1 notice proposing to re-open the assessment under Section 25 (1) & 25A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the the 'KVAT Act', for short). The said notice was challenged questioning validity of the 101th amendment of the Constitution and the introduction of Section 174 in the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. Inter alia, the appellant challenged the notice on the ground that the assessment proposed stands time barred under Section 25 (1) of the KVAT Act.
The writ petition was dismissed by the Single Judge along with a batch of other cases on holding that the question adjudicated stands covered through the judgment in W.P (C) No.11335/2018 and connected cases, dated 11-01-2019. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the judgment in W.P (C) No.11335/2018 covers only the question of WA No.816/2019 -3- validity of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act and it does not decide the question with respect to limitation prescribed under Section 25 (1) of the KVAT Act. Learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) had fairly conceded the said aspect. Under such circumstances, we think it appropriate to remit the matter for fresh consideration, and disposal by the Single Judge, on the question of limitation raised based on provisions of Section 25 (1) of he KVAT Act.
In the result, the above appeal is hereby allowed. The impugned judgment in W.P (C) No.18630/2018, dated 24-01-2019 is hereby set aside. The writ petition is restored on the files of this court for fresh consideration and disposal on the merits of the contentions based on the question of limitation under Section 25 (1) of the KVAT Act.
The registry shall post the writ petition before the Single Judge dealing with the subject, as per the roster.
Needless to observe that the interim order of stay as existed on the date of dismissal of the writ petition, shall stand revived and will continue to be in force. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI JUDGE AMG
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.