Mr. Mathew Korah P. vs. State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner submitted an application for rectification of an error invoking Section 66 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner has specifically pointed out the nature of error in Ext.P4 and without adverting to this and without hearing the petitioner, an order has been passed rejecting the application. I am of the view that the matter shall be reconsidered after adverting to Ext.P4. The request of the petitioner for rectification has to be considered with reference to the particular facts urged in the application. The petitioner shall appear before the Officer on 04.04.2019 and thereafter, after adverting to the nature of the rectification sought, a reasoned order shall be passed in the matter. Appropriate order thereon shall be passed within a period of two weeks. Till then, the recovery proceedings shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. SAS/22/03/2019 //// A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE P.A. TO JUDGE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE REVISED NOTICE DATED 27/04/2018. EXHIBIT P2OF THE REPLY DATED 1/06/2018. EXHIBIT P3OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2012-13. EXHIBIT P4OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION DATED 10/07/2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-
EXHIBIT P5OF THE INTERIM ORDER GRANTED BY THIS HON'BLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN WP(C) NO.42422/2018 DT. 21/12/18. EXHIBIT P6OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.32151003592/12-13 DATED 21/01/2019.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.