Cordial Company vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner has been served with notice under section 95 of the KVAT Act. Ext.P5 is the notice. The petitioner is only request for the sufficient time may be given to the respond. In such circumstances, I am of the view that the petitioner may be given three months from today to respond Ext.P5 notice. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE SMA
WP(C).No. 8915 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE PRE-ASSESSMENT NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 25 OF THE KVAT ACT EXHIBIT P2OF THE ADJOURNMENT REQUEST EXHIBIT P3OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P5OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY HE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P6OF THE REQUEST LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P7OF THE ANNUAL RETURN EXHIBIT P7 (a)OF THE AUDITED STATEMENT IN FORM 13 AND 13A RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL SMA
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.