S.Vaheed Kutty vs. The Asst.Commissioner (Assessment)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T Heard Sri. Harisankar V. Menon, the petitioner's counsel and Sri. C.K. Govindan, the learned senior Government Pleader.
The petitioner prays for consideration of Ext.P3 application made for rectification of mistakes noted and pointed out in the assessment order. The mistakes pointed out in Ext.P3 are noticed by this Court. Keeping in view the nature of mistakes pointed out by the petitioner in two cases, the fitness of things that the 1st respondent considers and passes orders on Ext.P3 application, within six weeks from today. This writ petition, hence, is disposed of by this judgment. The 1st respondent considers and passes orders on Ext.P3, after affording opportunity to the petitioner within six weeks from today. The respondents are directed to maintain status quo as on today, as regards recovery of tax determined for the year 2012-13 for six weeks. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE DST
WP(C).No.11370 of 2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 19.2.2019 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR 2012-13 DATED 14.3.2019 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8.4.2019 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //// P.A.To Judge
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.