M/S. Icon Ply vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T Heard Sri N. Muraleedharan Nair, the petitioner's counsel and Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader.
The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 delay petition and Ext.P4 stay petition expeditiously.
Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P3 and P4 delay and stay petitions, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The recovery proceedings pursuant to the order under appeal before the second respondent are stayed for two months from today. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE JJJ
W.P.(C) No. 12108/2019 -3- APPENDIX EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER CST ACT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 31.12.2018 EXHIBIT P2OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.03.2019 EXHIBIT P3OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.03.2019 EXHIBIT P4OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPODNENT DATED 28.03.2019 EXHIBIT P5OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 31.12.2018
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.