M/S. Kunnathan Wood Products vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P1 penalty order issued under the Provisions of the KVAT Act.
The petitioner submits that Ext.P3 appeal has been preferred against Ext.P1 and Ext.P4 stay petition have also been moved.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the opinion that Ext.P4 stay petition is liable to be considered by the 2nd respondent without further delay before enforcing the revenue recovery proceedings as against the petitioner on the strength of Ext.P1. There will accordingly be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take up, consider and pass appropriate order on Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner also, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P4 as directed above, coercive steps against the petitioner on the strength of Ext.P2 shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. ANU SIVARAMAN RR JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ORDER DATED 28/2/2019 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 28/2/2019 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3OF THE APPEAL DATED 17/4/2019 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 17/4/2019 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.