Sankar-La Retail Limited vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Heard Sri. K.S Hariharan Nair., the counsel for the petitioner and Smt. M.M Jasmine, the learned Government Pleader.
The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 delay condonation and Ext.P4 stay petition expeditiously.
Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 delay condonation and Ext.P4 stay petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed for two months from today. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE SJ
WP(C).No.16189 of 2019 -3- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 25.02.2019 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 31.05.2019 AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION DATED 31.05.2019 IN EXT. P2 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 31.05.2019 IN EXT. P2 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.05.2019.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.