Tekton Builders And Contractors vs. State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T Abdul Rehim, J: Appellant herein is the petitioner in W.P (C) No.26920/2018, challenging dismissal of the writ petition through the judgment dated 16-01-2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition.
Exhibit P1 order of assessment with respect to the year 2016-2017 was challenged in the writ petition by raising a contention that, since the appellant was under a scheme of compounding the rate of tax which ought to have been applied is the compounded rate and not the normal rate at which tax is leviable. Inter alia, the petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act (KSGST Act for short). The writ petition was dismissed along with a batch of other cases by holding that the question involved stands squarely covered against the appellant by virtue of the judgment in W.P (C) No.11335/2018 and connected cases dated 11-01-2019. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the learned Single Judge had omitted to consider the grounds raised
WA No.1282/2019 -3- other than the question of validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act. Fact that the judgment in W.P (C) No.11335/2018 covers only the question regarding validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act, is fairly conceded by the learned Government Pleader. It is also conceded that, against the said judgment a large number of writ appeals were already admitted and are pending disposal.
Under such circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that a remittance of the writ petition for a fresh consideration and disposal on the questions other than the validity of Section 174, would suffice to meet the ends of justice,
Hence the above writ appeal is hereby allowed. The impugned judgment in W.P (C) No.26920/2018 is hereby set aside. The writ petition is restored on to the files of this court. The registry is directed to post the writ petition before the Single Judge dealing with the subject matter, as per the roster.
Interim order if any existed in the writ petition shall stand revived and shall continue to be in force. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI AMG JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.