Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner(Assessment)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 stay application within a period of two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE jv JUDGE
WP(C).No.17376 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.03.2019 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 25.04.2019 AGAINST EXT. P1. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 25.04.2019 IN EXT.P2 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 10.06.2019.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.