Dileep Pawar vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against order issued by the first respondent, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 stay application within a period of two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE akv
WP(C).No.19738 of 2019 -3- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE IN FORM, NO.1 ISSUED BY THE 3RD 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL.
////
C.A. TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.