P.S.Sherly vs. The Asst.Commissioner(Asssessment)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Heard Sri. Harisankar V.Menon, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.Thushara James and Smt.M.M Jasmine, the learned Government Pleaders.
The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 notice dated 24.03.2019 issued under Section 25(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 (for short, the Act) as illegal and beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 25(1) of the Act. The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the question raised in the instant writ petition is no more res integra. Having regard to the judgment dated 19.07.2018 in W.A No.230 of 2017 and batch no more res integra.
Notice impugned in the writ petition is set aside by following the judgment dated 19.07.2018 in W.A No.230 of 2017 and batch. The writ petition is ordered as indicated above. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE JS
WP(C).No.9752 OF 2019(T) -3- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 2.3.2019 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 24.3.2019
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.