M/.S. Vyshakh International Hotel PVT.LTD. vs. Asst.Commissioner Of State Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T Against Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders for the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner preferred appeals before the first appellate authority. The said appeals were dismissed by Exts.P3 and P4 orders. The petitioner thereupon preferred Exts.P5 and P6(a) appeals together with Exts.P7 and P8(a) stay petitions before the 3rd respondent. While the stay applications were pending consideration before the 3rd respondent, the petitioner was intimated through Ext.P9 letter issued by the 4th respondent bank that it had received instruction from the sales tax Department, and pursuant to that, the account of the petitioner with the said bank has been frozen. In the Writ Petition, the limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on the stay petitions and to stay the recovery proceedings initiated by the Department, in the meanwhile.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case
WP(C).No.25801 OF 2019(A) 3 as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:
The 3rd respondent shall consider and pass reasoned orders on Exts.P7 and P8(a) stay petitions within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.
Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 3rd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. Taking note of the stay granted by this Court, the 4th respondent bank shall permit the petitioner to operate the bank account and the proposal in Ext.P9 letter shall not be given effect to.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 3rd respondent, for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE mns
WP(C).No.25801 OF 2019(A) 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 10.07.2018. EXHIBIT P2OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 31.12.2018. EXHIBIT P3OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 15.03.19 IN RESPECT OF EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXHIBIT P4OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 26.04.19 IN RESPECT OF EXT.P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXHIBIT P5OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AS AGAINST EXT.P3 APPELLATE ORDER. EXHIBIT P6OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AS AGAINST EXT.P4 APPELLATE ORDER. EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR THE YEAR 2015-1 EXHIBIT P7OF THE AFFIDAVIT WITH STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P5 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P8OF THE AFFIDAVIT WITH STAY PETITION FOR ALONG WITH EXT.P6 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P8 AOF THE AFFIDAVIT WITH STAY PETITION ALONG WITH EXT P6(A) APPEAL EXHIBIT P9OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BANK TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL //// P.A TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.