Hungers End vs. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and stay petition before the 3rd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by the respondents against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P1 assessment order.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:
The 3rd respondent to consider and pass reasoned orders on Ext.P2 stay petition within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.
Recovery steps pursuant to ExtP3 Demand Notice for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 3rd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 3rd respondent, for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE SJ
WP(C).No.32841 OF 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.10.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2OF THE K V A T APPEAL MEMORANDUM ALONGWITH APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 03RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 04.06.2019 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.