Patharam Service Co-Operative Bank LTD No.721 vs. The State Tax Officer-Ii

Original PDF →
WP(C)/7166/2020HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01018422202010 March 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL4 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.7166 OF 2020(U) PETITIONER/S: PATHARAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.721 PATHARAM.P.O, SOORANAD SOUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PREMKUMAR.B. BY ADV. SRI.BOBBY JOHN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II KARUNAGAPPALLY,STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT,MINI CIVIL STATION, KARUNAGAPPALLY,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690518. 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS), KOLLAM,STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT,ASRMAM.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN-691002. 3 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUR TALUK,MINI CIVIL STATION BUILDING,SASTHAMKOTTA.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN-690521. DR THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 WP(C).No.7166 OF 2020(U) JUDGMENT Dated this the 10th day of March 2020 The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that against the assessment order dated 28.02.2019 for the assessment year 2012-13 passed under the erstwhile kerala Value Added Tax, 2003, preferred an appeal along with stay application Exts.P2 and P3 dated 28.02.2020 and 29.02.2020, but the same has not been taken up, however, during the pendency of the appeal, demand under the provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act,1968, has been raised by the 4th respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the application for stay would be considered, in case a time frame is fixed by this Court, though several appeals are pending 3 WP(C).No.7166 OF 2020(U) consideration. 3. Having heard both sides of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merit, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the application of stay within a period of 30 days from the date

of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till such time the demand pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5 raised under the provisions of Kerala Revenue Recovery Act,1968 shall remain stayed. It is made clear that the aforementioned order of stay of this Court is only till the disposal of the application of stay. The writ petition stand disposed of. AMIT RAWAL JUDGE hmh

4 WP(C).No.7166 OF 2020(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28/02/2019,PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT,FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 EXHIBIT P2OF THE APPEAL DATED 28/02/2020,FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST THE EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 EXHIBIT P3OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY,DATED 29/02/2020,FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 EXHIBIT P4 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT,UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT,1968 EXHIBIT P5 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT,UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT,1968. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.