V.C.Constructions vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P1 notice. Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition in its challenge against Ext.P1 notice, I find that, inasmuch as Ext.P1 is only a notice, and the petitioner has an opportunity to respond to the same and get the matter adjudicated by the adjudicating authority, a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India at this stage is not to be entertained. Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the adjudicating authority after filing objections to the notice, the writ petition is dismissed. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE mns/24.8.2020
W.P.(C).No.17496 of 2020 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS
: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 15.6.2020. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL //// P.A TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.