Martin George vs. The State Tax Officer (Works Contract)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
It is agreed by the learned counsel on either side that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is covered in favour of the petitioner by the decision of this Court in Baiju A.A and Others V. State Tax Officer and Others (2020 (1) KHC 39). Taking note of the said submission, the Writ Petition is allowed following the aforementioned decision by quashing Ext.P3 assessment order with consequential reliefs to the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE mns/02.11.2020
WP(C).No.23283 OF 2020(I) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF PRE-ASSESSMENT NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL //// P.A TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.