Prestige Estates Projects LTD. vs. The Assistant Commissioner (Wc And Lt)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. Ext.P4 is the demand notice. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the appeal itself was posted for hearing on 10.11.2020, but the hearing did not take place as scheduled.
Taking note of the said submission, I dispose the writ petition by directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P2 appeal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts pursuant to Ext.P4 demand notice shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 2nd respondent as directed and the order communicated to the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE WP(C).No.24904 OF 2020(K) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER IS ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE IN FORM 1 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF E-mail SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.