Fantasy Sales Corporation vs. Assistant Commissioner Special Circle-1
Held
The Court found that the assessment order was not barred by limitation as the notice for re-opening was issued within the prescribed time. The petitioner was directed to pursue their alternate remedy of appeal.
Facts
The petitioner challenged a revised assessment order passed under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner contended that the order was vitiated by limitation.
Key Issues
Whether the revised assessment order was barred by limitation and if a writ petition was the appropriate remedy.
Sections Cited
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 revised assessment order passed under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.
Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition especially with regard to the order being vitiated by limitation, I am of the view that the order cannot be said to be barred by limitation inasmuch as the notice proposing the re-opening was issued well within time for the assessment year 2009-2010. I am of the view that against Ext.P4 revised assessment order, the petitioner ought
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.