Suharabhi vs. The State Of Kerala

Original PDF →
RP/133/2021HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01009541202117 February 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.NIRMAL. S, SMT.VEENA HARI, SMT.IRENE ELZA SOJI, SMT.RIA ELIZABETH JOSEPH, RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:, THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE 673 001...For Respondent: SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Heard together (2 matters)

RP.No.133 OF 2021
WP(C) 832/2021

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942 RP.No.133 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 832/2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 832/2021(D) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DTD.13.01.2021 REVIEW PETITIONER: SUHARABHI, AGED 64 YEARS W/O. LATE MUHAMMED KOYA, KONADATH HOUSE, KULANGARA PEEDIKA, POOKKUNNU, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. BY ADVS. SRI.NIRMAL. S SMT.VEENA HARI SMT.IRENE ELZA SOJI SMT.RIA ELIZABETH JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE 673 001 3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE) SPECIAL SQUAD, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, NIRMAL ARCADE BUILDING, ERNAHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 006. 4 THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SQUAD III, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 5 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE) STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, NIRMAL ARCADE BUILDING, ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 006. OTHER PRESENT: SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P. No.133/2021 2

Dated this the 17th day of February 2021 This review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 13.01.2021 in W.P.(C) No.832 of 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the review petitioner points out alleged error in the judgment dated 13.01.2021 and submits that the said judgment needs to be reviewed.

The review juri iction of this Court cannot be used as appellate juri iction and the review cannot be an appeal in disguise. No case for review is made out by pointing out any error apparent on the face of record in the judgment.

This review petition is therefore dismissed. A.M.BADAR JUDGE smp

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.