O/E/N INDIA LTD. vs. State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner contends that the appeal as well as the stay petition challenging the assessment orders were heard by the 2nd respondent on 28.09.2021 and the same has been reserved for orders. However, on the same day itself, the petitioner was served with Ext.P5 revenue recovery notice issued by the 4th respondent. Petitioner contends that petitioner would be put to irreparable loss and hardships if Ext.P5 is implemented before orders in appeal are rendered.
I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Government Pleader.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to keep in abeyance all further coercive actions, pursuant to Ext.P5, until, orders on Ext.P3 stay petition are passed by the 2nd respondent. The writ petition shall stand disposed of. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM
WP(C) NO. 20773 OF 2021 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 01.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE STATE TAX OFFICER (WORKS CONTRACT), ERNAKULAM FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 (CST) P1 (a) : COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 18.02.2021 ISSUED BY THE STATE TAX OFFICER (WORKS CONTRACT), ERNAKULAM FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 (CST) P2 : COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) DATED 02.07.2021.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.