M/A. Sreeman Jewel Craft vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner is an assessee under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, relating to the assessment year 2015- 2016, petitioner has preferred an appeal along with a delay condonation petition and also an application seeking stay of recovery.
The learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that even though the appeal itself was heard by the 1st respondent on 30.09.2021 and that the orders are awaited, petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected, even before the final orders are passed by the 1st respondent.
Having regard to the fact that the appeal itself was heard on 30.09.2021, I deem it appropriate to direct all WP(C) NO. 21786 OF 2021 3 coercive action proposed to be initiated or initiated against the petitioner to be kept in abeyance, until final orders in the appeal are passed by the 1st respondent. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE AMV/11/10/2021
WP(C) NO. 21786 OF 2021 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21786/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25/03/2021. Exhibit P2OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 08/07/2021. Exhibit P3OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 08/07/2021. Exhibit P4OF THE PETITION TO CONDONE THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL DATED 08/07/2021. Exhibit P5OF THE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13/07/2021. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL ////
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.