Deepa Shibu vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner is an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to assessment year 2015-2016, petitioner has preferred a second appeal before the 3rd respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also been filed as Ext.P4. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay petition, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till
WP(C) NO. 5596 OF 2022 3 such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings, pursuant to Ext.P5, against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE ssa/
WP(C) NO. 5596 OF 2022 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C)
5596
/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16, DATED 18.10.2019. Exhibit P2OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST APPELLATE AUTHORITY IN KVATA (ALPY) NO.22/2021 DATED 21.12.2021. Exhibit P3OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 & P2, DATED 12.01.2022. Exhibit P4OF THE PETITION FOR STAY DATED 12.01.2022, FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P3 APPEAL. Exhibit P5OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED UNDER R.R. ACT, DATED 13.12.2019 AND COERCIVE STEPS HAVE BEEN REVIVED.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.