M/S. Nippon Q1 Projects PVT LTD. vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 assessment order against which he preferred an appeal and Ext.P2 order has been passed modifying the assessment.
Against Ext.P2, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P3(a) stay petition. The only relief sought for is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3(a) stay petition and to defer any recovery proceedings till the consideration of the stay petition.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3(a) stay petition, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time, as orders are passed on Ext.P3(a), recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. GOPINATH P. JUDGE nkr
WP(C) NO. 15509 OF 2022 3 APPENDIX OF WPC 15509 OF 2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.02.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.2022 Exhibit P3 MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P3(a) STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 DEMAND NOTICE DATED 08.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNDER THE RR ACT
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.