P.Kandankutty&Sons-Sea Queen Hotel vs. Deputy Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to assessment year 2019-20, petitioner has preferred a second appeal before the third respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also been filed as Ext.P4. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay petition, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16376/2022 PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 14-08-2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2019-20 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER DATED 03-08-2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 22-11-2021 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 22-11-2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE DATED 12-05-2022 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.