Mohammed Nazeer V.A. vs. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to assessment year 2015-16, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also been filed as Ext.P4 along with Ext.P3 delay petition. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition for stay along with delay petition is considered. Hence this writ petition.
Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay petition as well as Ext.P3 delay petition, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a WP(C) NO. 17321 OF 2022 decision is taken, all coercive proceedings against Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM
WP(C) NO. 17321 OF 2022 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17321/2022 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS : Exhibit P1 COPY OF ORDER DATED 11/01/2022 COMPLETED U/S. 25(1) OF THE KVAT ACT FOR 2015-16 BY 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL SUBMITTED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ORDER. Exhibit P3 COPY OF PETITION FOR CONDONING DELAY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT.P2 APPEAL, BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT.P2 APPEAL, BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE UNDER R R ACT ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT, PURSUANT TO EXT.P1 ORDER.
//// PA TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.