Sathyapalan vs. The Joint Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that his application for refund of certain excess amounts allegedly paid by him under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the KVAT Act) has not been allowed in full through Ext.P3 proceedings dated 20.4.2021 of the 1st respondent. It is submitted that all the records were not before the 1 st respondent at the relevant time and therefore, the petitioner had filed Ext.P1 seeking a reconsideration of the amounts determined as refundable in terms of Ext.P3. 2. The learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would point out that Ext.P3 is an appealable order in terms of Section 55 of the KVAT Act and if the petitioner has any grievance in respect of Ext.P3, it is for the petitioner to approach the Tribunal. It is submitted that all the additional materials that the petitioner has to place on record can be considered by the Tribunal and the 1st respondent cannot reconsider Ext.P3 order once it has been issued.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the claim put forth by the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner may file an appeal before the Tribunal against Ext.P3 order and the Tribunal shall, while disposing of the appeal to be filed by the petitioner, take into account any additional materials that may be placed on record by the petitioner to determine whether the correct amount has been refunded to the petitioner in terms of Ext.P3. If such an appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, the same shall be treated as one filed within time and appropriate orders shall be passed thereon, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. GOPINATH P. JUDGE okb/11.7 //// P.S. to Judge APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22261/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THEOF THE REQUEST DATED 18.10.2021 MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE STATE TAX OFFICER - PONKUNNAM Exhibit P2 THEOF THE REQUEST DATED 18.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE JOINT COMMISSIONER - KOTTAYAM, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT Exhibit P3 THEOF THE ORDER NO:DC/KTM/1776/2018-D5 DATED 20.04.2021 OF JOINT COMMISSIONER - KOTTAYAM, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT Exhibit P4 THEOF THE K-VAT ONLINE TRANSACTION DETAILS FROM JUNE 2010 TO JUNE 2016 OF THADATHIL TIMBERS Exhibit P5 THEOF THE STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS OF ACCOUNT NO: 67105026570 OF THE STATE BANK OF INDIA FORM 19.04.2010 TO 12.03.2019 Exhibit P6OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 09.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER - ERUMELY FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2012 - 13 Exhibit P7 .OF THE CERTIFICATES DATED 09.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER - ERUMELY FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2013 - 14 Exhibit P8OF THE CERTIFICATES DATED 09.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER - ERUMELY FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2014-15 Exhibit P9OF THE CERTIFICATES DATED 09.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER - ERUMELY FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2015-16
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.