M/S. V-Tech Electric PVT. LTD. vs. The Assi Stant Commissioner (Wc & Lt)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
The petitioner preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority against Ext.P1 order of assessment, which was rejected by Ext.P2 order. The petitioner has filed a further appeal (Ext.P3) to the 2nd respondent Tribunal. Pending consideration of the matter by the Tribunal, the petitioner apprehends proceedings for recovery of amount payable under Ext.P1. 2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that further proceedings for recovery of any amounts due under Ext.P1 order of assessment shall be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken on Ext.P3, on condition that the petitioner remits a sum equivalent to 10% of the amount assessed under Ext.P1 within a period of 2 weeks from today. Writ petition is disposed of as above. GOPINATH P. ats
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 24237 OF 2022 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24237/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD. 15-03-2022. Exhibit P2 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIOENR (APPEALS), THRISSUR DTD. 23-04-2022. Exhibit P3 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 02-07-2022 RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS: NIL
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.