Zodiac Advertisers vs. Assistant Commissioner (Works Contract)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
When this matter is taken up for consideration today, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition, leaving open all the contentions since the petitioner wishes to pursue an application under the Amnesty Scheme which is now in force. Having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed leaving open all the contentions of the petitioner and reserving the liberty of the petitioner to approach this Court again, if necessary at the later stage. It is also made clear that it will be open to the petitioner to pursue the application for settlement of liabilities under the Amnesty Scheme now in force. GOPINATH P.
JUDGE ats
WP(C) NO. 16170 OF 2019 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16170/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1OF NOTICE DATED 14.09.2018 U/SEC.25(1) OF THE KVAT ACT,2003 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2OF THE REPLY STATEMENT DATED 10.05.2019 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3OF THE FINAL ORDER DATED 27.05.2019 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4OF THE PETITION DATED 09.05.2019 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE INFORMATION OFFICER. EXHIBIT P5OF THE REPLY DATED 29.05.2019 FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.