M/S. Krishna Holiday Village vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax
Original PDF →IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNE AY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 22931 OF 2022 PETITIONER: M/S. KRISHNA HOLIDAY VILLAGE AMALA NAGAR, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.B. JIJU, S/O BALAKRISHNAN RESIDING AT KALAPURAYIL HOUSE, ETTUMANA POST, KARUVANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680711 BY ADVS. N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR ANTONY JONES RESPONDENT: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX SPECIAL CIRCLE, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680004 BY SR. ADV SMT. THUSHARA JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (C) No.22931/2022 -2- J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs.- “(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order to quash Ext.P4 passed by the respondent and to allow the petitioner to pay the balance arrears of tax in 36 monthly installments; (b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondent not to take any steps to realize the balance amount due under Ext.P1 assessment order and Ext.P2 & P3 demand notices.”
The petitioner is an assesse under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'KGST Act' for short) engaged in running a bar attached hotel. For the assessment year 2020-21 the petitioner did not pay the self assessed tax which according to the petitioner was on account of financial difficulties. The petitioner approached the respondent who by Ext.P4 granted 6 monthly installments to pay a total sum of Rs.1,30,13,412/-. The first installment payable on 10-06-2022 was paid by the petitioner. But the subsequent installments payable on 10-07-2022, 10-08-2022, 10-09-2022 and 10-10-2022 have not been paid by the petitioner. The last installment is payable on 10-11-2022. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that if the petitioner is given a reasonable time the petitioner will be in a position to pay off the entire tax due along with the interest demanded.
The learned Senior Government Pleader refers to the provisions under Rule 30B of the KGST Rules and points out that the said Rule is the only enabling provision permitting the tax payer to pay the amounts due from him in installments. It is submitted that in the case of the petitioner the amount now demanded from the petitioner are amounts payable as self assessed tax and no further demand was imposed on the petitioner at the time of assessment. It is
W.P (C) No.22931/2022 -3- submitted that grant of further installment will create a bad precedent as there is no provision permitting the grant of such installment.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior Government Pleader for respondents, I am of the view that considering the fact that the petitioner is pointing out that he was unable to pay the tax in lump sum or in installments as granted by Ext.P4 only on account of severe financial difficulties caused by COVID-19 pandemic which seriously affected by the hotel industry, I am of the view that notwithstanding the fact that there is no statutory provision to grant such installment to the petitioner, the petitioner can be granted one further opportunity to clear the liability in installments. I make it clear that this order shall not be treated as a precedent and is issued purely as a matter of indulgence and taking into account the fact that the petitioner was in serious financial difficulties owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is not disputed before me that the petitioner paid the 1st installment due under Ext.P1. The last installment is payable on 10-11- 2022. Taking into consideration of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner; (i) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.21,68,903/- payable on 10-11-2022 (the last installment) on or before that date; (ii) The installments which were not paid on 10-07-2022, 10-08-2022, 10-09- 2022 and 10-10-2022 shall be paid in 3 equal monthly installments starting from 10-12-2022. The subsequent installments shall be paid on or before 10th day of succeeding months along with any further interest that may be demanded from the petitioner.
W.P (C) No.22931/2022 -4- It is made clear that no further indulgence will be granted to the petitioner and if the petitioner does not pay the amount as directed above, it is open to the respondents to initiate recovery proceedings against the petitioner. If the petitioner has any dispute regarding the interest charged on turnover tax to be paid for the parcel sales for the period for which it was permitted until the clarification was issued by the Government, it is open to the petitioner to raise that dispute in appropriate proceedings. GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG
W.P (C) No.22931/2022 -5- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22931/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER THE KGST ACT FOR THE YEAR 2020-21 DATED 28.04.2022. Exhibit P2OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN FORM NO.13 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 28.04.2022 Exhibit P3OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN FORM NO.24 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 28.04.2022 Exhibit P4OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 26.05 .2022 Exhibit P5OF THE CHALAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DATED 13.06.2022
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.