Mavji Haribhai Oil Cake Industries vs. Union Of INDIA

SCA/12267/2019HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24045665201925 September 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the petition had become infructuous. This decision was based on the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioners that the refund of IGST had been paid to the petitioner. Consequently, the grievance that was the subject matter of the petition no longer survived. The Court did not delve into the merits of the original grievance or the specific provisions of the GST law that might have been invoked. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition as infructuous.

Facts

The petitioners, Mavji Haribhai Oil Cake Industries, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The petition challenged an order or action by the revenue authorities concerning GST. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed. The core of the matter was a grievance raised by the petitioners against the respondents, which included the Union of India and other authorities.

Key Issues

1. Whether the grievance raised by the petitioners in the Special Civil Application has become infructuous. The petitioner argued that the refund of IGST has subsequently been paid to them. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment. The issue hinges on the factual development of the case post-filing of the petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/SCA/12267/2019 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12267 of 2019 ====================================== MAVJI HARIBHAI OIL CAKE INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA ====================================== Appearance: UCHIT N SHETH(7336) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2 MR PY DIVYESHVAR(2482) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 MR. PARTH H BHATT(6381) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,5 ====================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 25/09/2019

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1.

Mr. Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioners has submitted that subsequently, the refund of IGST has been paid to the petitioner and hence, the grievance voiced in the petition no longer survives.

2.

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. [ Harsha Devani, J. ] [ Sangeeta K. Vishen, J. ] hiren

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.