Ms Shankar Ferro Alloys Private Limited Represented Through Its Director Shri Dilip Jaiswal vs. Union Of INDIA Represented By Secretary Ministry Of Finance Deptt Of Revenue

WPC/1936/2020HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01014297202013 January 2021Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioners' request for an extension of the payment deadline under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Instead, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought and was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition on instructions. The respondents' counsel had no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the legal issues raised, nor were any operative directions issued beyond the dismissal of the petition. The Court did not express any opinion on whether the circumstances warranted an extension or on the applicability of the Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020, to the Sabka Viswas Scheme.

Facts

The petitioners, M/s. Shankar Ferro Alloys Private Limited and two individuals, filed a writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court. They sought an extension of the last date for payment under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, until September 30, 2020. The petitioners argued that the nationwide lockdown, imposed to contain the spread of COVID-19, necessitated this extension, citing similar extensions granted under other fiscal statutes like the Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020. The respondents were the Union of India and the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs. The petition was filed seeking these reliefs.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to an extension of the last date for payment under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, until September 30, 2020, due to the nationwide lockdown caused by COVID-19? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioners contended that the nationwide lockdown, declared by the Ministry of Home Affairs to combat COVID-19, significantly impacted their ability to make timely payments under the Sabka Viswas Scheme. They argued that the circumstances warranted an extension, drawing a parallel with extensions granted under other fiscal statutes, specifically mentioning the Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020, which provided relief for other tax-related deadlines. They sought a writ of certiorari and other appropriate directions to extend the payment deadline. Revenue's Argument: The judgment records no specific argument from the respondents (Union of India and CBIC) regarding the merits of the extension sought by the petitioners.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W. P. (T) No. 1936 of 2020

1.

M/s. Shankar Ferro Alloys Private Limited

2.

Dilip Jaiswal

3.

Ajay Gupta, Ajay Kumar Gupta

…. Petitioners Versus

1.

Union of India

2.

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, New Delhi… Respondents --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Through Video Conferencing --- For the Petitioners : M/s. Nitin Kumar Pasari & Vishakha Gupta, Advocates For the CGST

: Mr. P.A.S.Pati, Advocate

--- 04/13.01.2021 Writ petition was filed for the following reliefs:

“(a) For issuance of a writ of certiorari and any other appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) directing upon the Respondents to extend the last date of payment of the quantified amount under Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 till 30.09.2020, taking into consideration the nation wide lockdown as declared by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, in order to contain the spread of COVID-19, as has been extended with respect to other fiscal statutes vi

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.