Atibir Industries Co LTD Unit Ii Throug Its Director Sandeep Kumar Sarawgi vs. The Union Of INDIA Through Its Pr Secretary Ministry Of Finance Deptt Of Revenue

WPC/4233/2019HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01026803201928 March 2023Bench: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J.,SRI ANANDA SEN, J.1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court considered the application filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of the writ application. The petitioner's counsel stated that their grievances have been redressed. The Court found this submission acceptable and proceeded to allow the application for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ application itself was allowed to be withdrawn. The specific nature of the grievances, the authority that passed the order under challenge, the tax period, the amount in dispute, and the specific provisions of law that formed the basis of the original grievance are not detailed in the judgment. Therefore, no specific findings on the merits of the GST dispute were made.

Facts

The petitioner, Atibir Industries Co. Ltd. (Unit-II), Giridih, filed a writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court challenging an order or action by the respondents, the Union of India and others. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not detailed, other than the filing of the writ application itself. The matter came before the Court for hearing.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner's grievances have been redressed, leading to the withdrawal of the writ application? Petitioner's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Respondents' Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the respondents regarding the redressal of grievances or opposition to the withdrawal application.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (T) No. 4233 of 2019

(with I.A. No. 2799 of 2023) Atibir Industries Co. Ltd. (Unit-II), Giridih ... ... Petitioner

Versus The Union of India and others … … … ... Respondents

--------- CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J.

SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

--------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjeet Kushwaha, Advocate

Mr. Akshay Kumar Mahato, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Sr. S.C. (CGST)

--------- 10/Dated: 28.03.2023

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

By filing an application being I.A. No. 2799 of 2023 for withdrawal of the writ application, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed.

In that view of the matter, I.A. No. 2799 of 2023 is allowed. Consequently, the writ application is allowed to be withdrawn.

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)

(Ananda Sen, J.) Manoj/-

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.