Agarwal Metcom Private Limited Through Its Director Namely Ratan Saharia vs. The Union Of INDIA Through Its Pr Secretary Ministry Of Finance Deptt Of Revenue

WPC/1406/2022HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01010163202203 May 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court allowed the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition W.P.(T) No. 1406 of 2022 was dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning provided is that the petitioner has filed an appeal before the Appellate Court challenging the order dated 23.12.2022, which was passed during the pendency of the writ application. This subsequent action by the petitioner renders the writ petition unnecessary. The Court also disposed of any pending interlocutory applications. No specific issues regarding GST law were decided, as the matter was disposed of on procedural grounds.

Facts

The petitioner, Agarwal Metcom Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court challenging an order passed by the revenue authorities. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Court against an order dated 23.12.2022. The petitioner then filed an interlocutory application before the High Court seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, citing the filing of the appeal as the reason. The respondents are the Union of India and various GST authorities, along with a private respondent, Divine Alloys & Power Company Limited.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition (W.P.(T) No. 1406 of 2022) in light of the subsequent filing of an appeal before the Appellate Court against an order dated 23.12.2022. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that since an appeal has been filed before the appropriate Appellate Court challenging the order dated 23.12.2022, which was passed during the pendency of the writ petition, the writ petition has become infructuous and should be permitted to be withdrawn. Revenue/State's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific argument from the respondents regarding the withdrawal of the writ petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(T) No. 1406 of 2022

Agarwal Metcom Private Limited, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum through its Director, namely, Ratan Saharia

... … Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union of India, through its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi

2.

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, through its Chairman, GST Policy Wing, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi

3.

Goods and Services Tax Council, through its Secretary having its office at Tower No. 2, 5th Floor, Jeevan Bharti Complex, Janpath, Connaught Place, New Delhi

4.

The Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbum

5.

Joint Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise Head Quarters, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbum

6.

The Assistant Commissioner (Preventive), CGST and Central Excise, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbum.

7.

The Superintendent (Preventive), CGST and Central Excise, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbum ... … Respondents

8.

Divine Alloys & Power Company Limited, thro

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.