Principal Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. Ms Sbw Udyog Limited

T.A./58/2018HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01023314201819 February 2026Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court granted leave to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning was based on the appellant's submission that the tax amount involved was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per the circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court expressly left the question of law open, meaning that the legal principles involved were not decided and could be raised in future litigation. No specific operative directions were issued beyond the withdrawal of the appeal.

Facts

The appellant, Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, sought to withdraw Tax Appeal No. 58 of 2018 against the respondent, M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited. The reason for withdrawal was that the tax amount in dispute was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as stipulated by a circular issued by the CBIC. The High Court considered the application for withdrawal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant should be granted leave to withdraw the appeal. This issue turns on the application of the CBIC circular regarding the monetary limit for filing appeals. The appellant argued that the tax amount in dispute was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per the CBIC circular, and therefore, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

( 2026:JHHC:4900-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Tax Appeal No. 58 of 2018

Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, P.O.- GPO & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi.

…. Appellant

Versus M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited, Ratanpur, P.O.& P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand.

…. Respondent

------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

------ For the Appellant : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate

Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate

Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate

For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate

Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate

Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate

----- Order No. 04

Dated : 19.02.2026

1.

Mr. P.A.S. Pati with Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant / applicant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground that tax amount involved in this matter is below the threshold limit of ru

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.