Principal Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. Ms Sbw Udyog Limited
Held
The Court granted leave to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning was based on the appellant's submission that the tax amount involved was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per the circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court expressly left the question of law open, meaning that the legal principles involved were not decided and could be raised in future litigation. No specific operative directions were issued beyond the withdrawal of the appeal.
Facts
The appellant, Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, sought to withdraw Tax Appeal No. 58 of 2018 against the respondent, M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited. The reason for withdrawal was that the tax amount in dispute was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as stipulated by a circular issued by the CBIC. The High Court considered the application for withdrawal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appellant should be granted leave to withdraw the appeal. This issue turns on the application of the CBIC circular regarding the monetary limit for filing appeals. The appellant argued that the tax amount in dispute was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per the CBIC circular, and therefore, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
( 2026:JHHC:4900-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tax Appeal No. 58 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, P.O.- GPO & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi.
…. Appellant
Versus M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited, Ratanpur, P.O.& P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand.
…. Respondent
------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
------ For the Appellant : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate
Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate
For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate
Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate
Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate
----- Order No. 04
Dated : 19.02.2026
Mr. P.A.S. Pati with Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant / applicant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground that tax amount involved in this matter is below the threshold limit of ru
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.