Principal Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. Ms Sbw Udyog Limited

T.A./57/2018HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01023320201819 February 2026Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning provided is that the tax amount involved is below the threshold limit specified in a circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court explicitly left the question of law open, meaning that the legal principles involved in the case were not decided and can be raised in future proceedings. No specific operative directions beyond the withdrawal of the appeal were issued.

Facts

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi (appellant) against M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited (respondent). The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the judgment. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the appeal before the High Court. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal can be withdrawn on the grounds of the tax amount being below the threshold limit stipulated by a CBIC circular? The appellant argued that the tax amount involved in the matter is below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per a circular issued by the CBIC, and therefore sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

( 2026:JHHC:4899-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Tax Appeal No. 57 of 2018

Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, P.O.- GPO & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi.

…. Appellant

Versus M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited, Ratanpur, P.O.& P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand.

…. Respondent

------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

------ For the Appellant : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate

Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate

Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate

For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate

Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate

Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate

----- Order No. 05

Dated : 19.02.2026

1.

Mr. P.A.S. Pati with Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant / applicant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground that tax amount involved in this matter is below the threshold limit of rup

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.