Principal Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. Ms Sbw Udyog Limited
Held
The Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning provided is that the tax amount involved is below the threshold limit specified in a circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court explicitly left the question of law open, meaning that the legal principles involved in the case were not decided and can be raised in future proceedings. No specific operative directions beyond the withdrawal of the appeal were issued.
Facts
The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi (appellant) against M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited (respondent). The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the judgment. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the appeal before the High Court. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appeal can be withdrawn on the grounds of the tax amount being below the threshold limit stipulated by a CBIC circular? The appellant argued that the tax amount involved in the matter is below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per a circular issued by the CBIC, and therefore sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
( 2026:JHHC:4899-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tax Appeal No. 57 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, P.O.- GPO & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi.
…. Appellant
Versus M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited, Ratanpur, P.O.& P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand.
…. Respondent
------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
------ For the Appellant : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate
Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate
For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate
Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate
Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate
----- Order No. 05
Dated : 19.02.2026
Mr. P.A.S. Pati with Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant / applicant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground that tax amount involved in this matter is below the threshold limit of rup
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.