Principal Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. Ms Sbw Udyog Limited
Held
The Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning provided is that the appellant sought withdrawal based on a CBIC circular stipulating a threshold limit of rupees one crore for tax amounts involved in appeals. The Court accepted this ground for withdrawal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court expressly left the question of law open, meaning this withdrawal does not set a precedent on the substantive legal issues that might have been argued had the appeal proceeded.
Facts
The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi (appellant) filed a Tax Appeal before the Jharkhand High Court against M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited (respondent). The appeal was filed against an order or action by an unspecified authority concerning Goods and Services Tax. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history leading to the appeal is also not detailed.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to grant leave to withdraw the appeal. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the tax amount involved was below the threshold limit of rupees one crore, as per a circular issued by the CBIC. The respondent's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The core issue revolves around the applicability of the CBIC circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
( 2026:JHHC:4898-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tax Appeal No. 56 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Ranchi, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, P.O.- GPO & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi.
…. Appellant
Versus M/s SBW Udyog Limited / Shyam Biri Works Limited, Ratanpur, P.O.& P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand.
…. Respondent
------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
------ For the Appellant : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate
Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate
For the Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate
Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate
Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate
----- Order No. 08
Dated : 19.02.2026
Mr. P.A.S. Pati with Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant / applicant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground that tax amount involved in this matter is below the threshold limit of rupees o
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.