Commissioner Of Central Excise vs. M/S.Neesa Infrastructure LTD.

TAXAP/626/2015HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24047912201510 October 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that permission to withdraw the appeal, as prayed for by the appellant, should be granted. The reasoning was based on the appellant's submission that they had received instructions to withdraw the appeal in light of revised monetary limits for filing tax appeals as per CBIC instructions dated 22.08.2019. The Court granted the permission, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn. However, the Court also provided a conditional liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the appeal if there was any error in the computation of the tax effect or if the CBIC instruction dated 22.08.2019 was not applicable for any reason. The ratio is that appeals can be withdrawn based on revised departmental monetary limits, subject to conditions for revival if the basis for withdrawal is found to be erroneous.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-North, filed a tax appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The appeal was against M/s. Neesa Infrastructure Ltd. The appellant's counsel submitted a note stating that based on written instructions from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, Ahmedabad-North, and in light of CBIC instructions dated 22.08.2019 revising the monetary limit for filing tax appeals, the appeal was to be withdrawn. The counsel requested permission to withdraw the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant, the Commissioner of Central Excise, should be permitted to withdraw the captioned tax appeal. This issue turns on the applicability of CBIC instructions dated 22.08.2019 regarding revised monetary limits for filing tax appeals. The appellant argued that as per the instructions received from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal) and the aforementioned CBIC instructions, the appeal was to be withdrawn. The respondent, M/s. Neesa Infrastructure Ltd., did not record any argument in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/626/2015 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 626 of 2015 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus M/S.NEESA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MR DHAVAL D VYAS(3225) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 10/10/2019

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1.

Mr.Dhaval D. Vyas, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant has submitted a note stating that as per the written instructions of the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, Ahmedabad-North dated 19.09.2019, in the light of the CBIC instructions dated 22.08.2019, revising the monetary limit for filing tax appeal, he has been instructed to withdraw the captioned tax appeal.

2.

The learned senior standing counsel for the appellant has accordingly requested permission to withdraw the appeal.

3.

Permission,

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.