Principal Commissioner vs. Sarabhai Chemicals

TAXAP/471/2016HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24051805201624 October 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that permission to withdraw the appeal, as prayed for by the appellant, is granted. The reasoning is based on the appellant's submission that they were instructed to withdraw the appeal due to the disputed duty amount of Rs. 60,53,674/- being less than the monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- stipulated by the Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court also noted that if there was any error in the computation of the tax effect or if the Board's instruction was not applicable for any reason, the appellant would have the liberty to seek revival of the appeal.

Facts

The Principal Commissioner, CGST & CX, Vadodara-I (appellant) filed a tax appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Sarabhai Chemicals (opponent). The appeal concerned a disputed duty amount of Rs. 60,53,674/-. The appellant's counsel placed on record a communication from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal) instructing withdrawal of the appeal. This instruction was based on a Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019, which stipulated a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for pursuing appeals, and the disputed amount was below this limit.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant is permitted to withdraw the captioned tax appeal, considering the monetary limit stipulated by the Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019? The appellant argued that it sought permission to withdraw the appeal as per the instructions received from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, HQ, Vadodara-I. This instruction was based on the Board's communication F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, which set a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for appeals, and the disputed duty of Rs. 60,53,674/- fell below this threshold. The revenue did not present any arguments against the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/471/2016 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 471 of 2016 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER Versus SARABHAI CHEMICALS ========================================================== Appearance: MR ANKIT SHAH(6371) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR DHAVAL SHAH(2354) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 24/10/2019

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1.

Mr. Ankit Shah, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant has placed on record a communication dated 27.08.2019 of the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, HQ, Vadodara-I instructing him that it has been decided to withdraw the captioned tax appeal as it involves duty of Rs.60,53,674/-, which is less than the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/- stipulated under Board's

instruction

issued

vide F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019. 2. The learned senior standing coun

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.