Principal Commissioner vs. Sarabhai Chemicals
Held
The Court held that permission to withdraw the appeal, as prayed for by the appellant, is granted. The reasoning is based on the appellant's submission that they were instructed to withdraw the appeal due to the disputed duty amount of Rs. 60,53,674/- being less than the monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- stipulated by the Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court also noted that if there was any error in the computation of the tax effect or if the Board's instruction was not applicable for any reason, the appellant would have the liberty to seek revival of the appeal.
Facts
The Principal Commissioner, CGST & CX, Vadodara-I (appellant) filed a tax appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Sarabhai Chemicals (opponent). The appeal concerned a disputed duty amount of Rs. 60,53,674/-. The appellant's counsel placed on record a communication from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal) instructing withdrawal of the appeal. This instruction was based on a Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019, which stipulated a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for pursuing appeals, and the disputed amount was below this limit.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appellant is permitted to withdraw the captioned tax appeal, considering the monetary limit stipulated by the Board's instruction dated 22.08.2019? The appellant argued that it sought permission to withdraw the appeal as per the instructions received from the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, HQ, Vadodara-I. This instruction was based on the Board's communication F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, which set a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for appeals, and the disputed duty of Rs. 60,53,674/- fell below this threshold. The revenue did not present any arguments against the withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
Mr. Ankit Shah, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant has placed on record a communication dated 27.08.2019 of the Assistant Commissioner (Legal), CGST & CX, HQ, Vadodara-I instructing him that it has been decided to withdraw the captioned tax appeal as it involves duty of Rs.60,53,674/-, which is less than the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/- stipulated under Board's
instruction
issued
vide F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019. 2. The learned senior standing coun
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.