M/S Rajesh Mundra S/O Shri Dindayal Mundra vs. Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise

SCA/10395/2020HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24035938202001 September 2020Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Avinash Poddar, after arguing for some length, stated that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the Court ordered the petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning is based solely on the petitioner's request. No specific findings on any GST provisions or substantive issues were made as the matter was withdrawn. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Rajesh Mundra, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The respondent was the Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, along with other CGST and Central Excise authorities. The petition was filed challenging an order or action passed by the revenue authorities. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. After arguing for some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the Special Civil Application as prayed for by their counsel? The petitioner's counsel argued that they wished to withdraw the petition. The revenue or State did not record any argument in opposition to the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/SCA/10395/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10395 of 2020 ========================================================== M/S RAJESH MUNDRA S/O SHRI DINDAYAL MUNDRA Versus COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE ========================================================== Appearance: MR. AVINASH PODDAR(9761) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Date : 01/09/2020

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)

Dr. Avinash Poddar, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some length states that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

It is accordingly dismissed. (VIKRAM NATH, CJ) (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) A. B. VAGHELA

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.