The Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise Commissionerate vs. M/S Vineet Polyfab PVT Limited

TAXAP/154/2020HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24008061202002 September 2020Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court accepted the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant. Based on the statement that the matter had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the Court ordered the appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning is solely based on the settlement of the dispute under the aforementioned scheme, which rendered the appeal infructuous. No other issues were discussed or decided by the Court.

Facts

The Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Ahmedabad, filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The appeal was against M/s Vineet Polyfab Pvt Limited. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to this appeal is also not elaborated. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the matter had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant, represented by Mr. Nikunt K. Raval, stated that the matter had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and therefore, sought to withdraw the appeal. The Court did not record any specific arguments from the respondent, M/s Vineet Polyfab Pvt Limited, on this matter.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/154/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 154 of 2020 ========================================================== THE COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE Versus M/S VINEET POLYFAB PVT LIMITED ========================================================== Appearance: MR NIKUNT K RAVAL(5558) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Date : 02/09/2020

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)

Mr. Nikunt K. Raval, learned counsel for the appellant states that he has instructions to state that this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn as the matter has already been settled under the Sabka Vishwas [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme, 2019. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (VIKRAM NATH, CJ) (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) Vahid

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.