M/S Super Powder Coating Anodizing And Trading Thru Its Proprietor Shri Dilip Mulchand Shethiya vs. Union Of INDIA
Facts
The writ applicant, M/s Super Powder Coating Anodizing and Trading, through its proprietor, challenged a notice for confiscation of goods and conveyance issued in Form GST MOV-10 dated October 14, 2020. The notice was issued under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017, alleging that the same invoice and e-way bills were used multiple times for transporting goods. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner had already deposited the amount towards tax, penalty, and fine in lieu of confiscation, and the goods and vehicle had been released. The High Court noted that the writ application could be disposed of on a short point.
Held
The Court noted that the writ applicant had already deposited the amount towards tax, penalty, and fine in lieu of confiscation, and the goods and vehicle had been released. In light of these circumstances, the Court directed the writ applicant to appear before the concerned authority and participate in the confiscation proceedings. The Court clarified that if any final order of confiscation is passed, it would be open for the writ applicant to prefer an appeal under Section 107 of the Act. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The writ application was disposed of with these observations.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notice for confiscation of goods and conveyance in Form GST MOV-10, issued under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017, is valid and legal, considering the petitioner has already deposited the tax, penalty, and fine and the goods and conveyance have been released. Contentions: Petitioner: Argued that the goods and conveyance have already been released after depositing the requisite amounts. The petitioner sought quashing of Form GST MOV-10 and Form GST MOV-06, release of goods and conveyance, and adjudication of the matter within a specific timeframe. The petitioner also sought to not face any coercive action pending disposal of the petition. Revenue: No specific arguments recorded from the revenue's side in the provided text.
Sections Cited
Section 130, Section 107, Form GST MOV-10, Form GST MOV-06
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
By this writapplication under Article226 of the Constitution of India, the writapplicant – a Proprietor of Proprietory Concern has prayed for the following reliefs: 10(a) be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction under Article226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the petitioner case and after going into the validity
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.