Pinnacle Life Science PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The Court held that the Petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed IGST refund. The Respondent's counsel acknowledged that Section 56 of the CGST Act provides for interest on delayed refunds. Based on this concession and the statutory provision, the Court directed the Respondent to calculate and pay the interest due to the Petitioner on the amount refunded late. The reasoning was that the law itself mandates payment of interest in such circumstances, and the Respondent's counsel did not contest this. The operative direction was for the Respondent to pay the calculated interest within four weeks. No other issues were expressly left undecided.
Facts
The Petitioner, Pinnacle Life Science Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the 'Risky Exporter' tag imposed on it and the subsequent withholding of its IGST refund. Subsequent to the filing of the petition, the 'Risky Exporter' tag was removed, and the Petitioner received the IGST refund. However, the Petitioner contended that no interest was paid on the delayed refund amount. The dispute, therefore, narrowed down to the entitlement of the Petitioner to receive interest on the refund.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed IGST refund, as per the provisions of the CGST Act? Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner argued that it is entitled to interest on the refund amount that was delayed. The Petitioner relied on the general principle that interest is payable on delayed refunds. Revenue's Contention: The Respondent, Union of India and Ors., through their counsel, conceded that the law provides for interest on delayed refunds under Section 56 of the CGST Act. They did not dispute the Petitioner's entitlement to interest.
Sections Cited
Section 56
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 916-Wp-11615-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11615 OF 2022 Pinnacle Life Science Pvt. Ltd.
…..Petitioner Vs. Union of India and Ors.
…..Respondents Mr. Prashant Namboodiri for Petitioner. Mr. J. B. Mishra a/w Ms. Maya Majumdar for Respondents. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE : 18th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C.:-
After the Petition was filed, the Risky Exporter tag against the Petitioner was removed and Petitioner also got the refund of IGST. Mr. Namboodiri stated that along with refund, no interest has been paid. The short point therefore remains is whether Petitioner should be paid interest on the refund amount. When the Court asked Mr. Mishra, in fairness, Mr. Mishra said the law provides interest on delayed refunds under Section 56 of the CGST Act.
In the circumstances, Respondent, shall within four weeks from today, calculate the interest and pay the same over to Petitioner on the amount refunded late.
Petition disposed. No order as to costs. (ARIF S. DOCT
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.