The State Tax Officer Phaltan 701 Satara Goods And Services Tax Bhavan 178 Satara vs. New Phaltan Sugar Works Applicant Distillery Division LTD Pune

IA/3222/2023HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01011596202330 March 2023Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The State Tax Officer, Phaltan, filed an interim application seeking permission from the Bombay High Court to conduct an assessment for the year 2018-2019. The State contended that the assessment would become time-barred after March 31, 2023, if not permitted. The original petitioner, New Phaltan Sugar Works Distillery Division Ltd., was also a party to the writ petition. The State sought to proceed with the assessment to avoid limitation issues.

Held

The Court granted permission to the State Tax Officer to carry out the assessment for the year 2018-2019. However, this permission was granted with a crucial condition: the effect of any assessment carried out would not be enforced and would remain subject to the final outcome of the writ petition. The Court also acknowledged the assessee's concern regarding the limited time for them to present their case. This contention was noted and stated to be considered when the main writ petition is taken up for hearing. The Court did not decide the merits of the assessment itself, but rather addressed the procedural aspect of limitation.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Court should grant permission to the State Tax Officer to carry out the assessment for the year 2018-2019, considering the impending limitation period. Arguments: Petitioner/Respondent No.1 (New Phaltan Sugar Works Distillery Division Ltd.): The petitioner expressed concern that due to the short time period available for assessment, they may not be afforded a proper opportunity to present their case. This contention was raised to highlight potential procedural unfairness if the assessment proceeded without adequate time for the assessee. Revenue/State (State Tax Officer, Phaltan): The State argued that permission was necessary to conduct the assessment for the year 2018-2019, as it would become time-barred after March 31, 2023. The primary contention was to preserve the State's right to assess the tax liability within the statutory time limits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Trupti 1 902-ia-3222-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3222 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 93652 OF 2020 The State Tax Officer Phaltan 701 Satara Goods and Services Tax Bhavan 178 Satara … Applicant versus New Phaltan Sugar Works Distillery Division Ltd. Pune & Ors. … Respondents …… Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for the State- Applicant/ Original Respondent No.

3.

Mr.Rahul Thakar i/b. C.B. Thakar and Co. for the Original Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, Mr.Dhananjay Deshmukh and Mr.Satyaprakash Sharma for Respondent No.1 -CGST. Mr. Ishaan Patkar with Mr. Durgesh Desai i/b. Alaksha Legal for Respondent No.4 Mr.Srisabari Rajan with Ms.Surabhi Prabhudesai i/b. DMD Advocate for Respondent No.

6.

Mr. Vinit Jain with Mr.Ashok Varma for Union of India. …… TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2023.03.31 10:18:54 +0530

Trupti 2 902-ia-3222-2023.doc

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &

ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : 30 MARCH 2023 P.C. :- By this interim application, the Applicant-

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.