Sandip Baban Mandlik vs. The Branch Manager,Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. LTD.Through Mr. Ashwin Kumar Gawai-Manager Lega
Held
The Court has not yet delivered a final judgment on the merits of the cases. Instead, it has adjourned the hearing for four weeks based on a request from the learned Additional Solicitor General (ASG). The ASG indicated that discussions have taken place with the Advocate General, and details have been sought from the respective departments. The respondents aim to present a concrete proposal on the next date of hearing. If no such proposal is forthcoming, the petitioners will be permitted to proceed with their arguments. The ad-interim relief granted to the petitioners is to continue until the disposal of the petitions. No specific findings on any legal issues have been recorded at this stage.
Facts
Numerous writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court concerning issues related to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The petitioners, including Sita Information Networking Computing India Pvt. Ltd. and others, are challenging various orders or actions taken by the State of Maharashtra and other respondents, which include the Union of India and CGST authorities. The specific tax periods and the exact nature of the orders under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. However, the proceedings indicate a dispute involving tax liabilities and departmental actions. The matters have been listed and are being heard by the High Court.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court is to address the grievances raised by the petitioners against the actions of the GST authorities. The State and Union governments have requested time to deliberate and potentially arrive at a concrete proposal to resolve the ongoing disputes. The Court is expected to decide on the validity of the actions taken by the revenue authorities and the relief to be granted to the petitioners. The specific legal questions and the arguments presented by each side are not fully detailed in this excerpt, as the matter was adjourned for further discussion and a potential settlement proposal from the respondents.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Tauseef
05-WP.1885.2021 & 06-WP.8988.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1885 OF 2021 Sita Information Networking Computing India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION
(L) NO.2273 OF 2024
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2483 OF 2021
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2192 OF 2021
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2232 OF 2021
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
105 OF 2022
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2856 OF 2022
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2666 OF 2019
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
3062 OF 2022
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2351 OF 2021
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.
2033 OF 2023
IN WRIT PETITION NO.
2351 OF 2021
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
116 OF 2022
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
3072 OF 2022
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
2051 OF 2019
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.
4455 OF 2022
WITH 1 of 6 TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2024.08.28 11:29:03 +0530
Tauseef
05-WP.1885.2021 &
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.