Haware Engineers And Builders PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA
Facts
The Petitioner, Haware Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court. The petition was filed against the Union of India and other respondents. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the matter was mentioned and taken on board with the consent of the parties. The Petitioner's counsel stated that in light of the enactment of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, which introduced sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/MGST Act, the Petitioner no longer wished to press the Writ Petition.
Held
The Court noted the statement made by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner that in light of the enactment of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, which introduced sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/MGST Act, the Petitioner did not wish to press the Writ Petition. Consequently, considering the Petitioner's statement, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn. No order as to costs was made. In light of the withdrawal of the Writ Petition, any pending interim applications were also disposed of as nothing survived in them. The Court directed that all concerned would act on production of a digitally signed copy of the order.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the Writ Petition in light of the enactment of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, specifically the introduction of sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/MGST Act. Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner, through its learned Advocate, stated that due to the enactment of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, and the introduction of sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/MGST Act, they do not wish to press the Writ Petition. Revenue/State's Contention: No specific argument or contention was recorded for the respondents (Union of India & Ors. and the State) regarding the Petitioner's decision to withdraw.
Sections Cited
Section 16
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
4-wp-2211-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 19142 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2024 Haware Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents Adv. Aman Mishra i/b UBR Legal for Petitioner/Applicant. Adv. Sangeeta Yadav a/w Adv. Umesh Gupta for Respondent No.
Adv. S.D. Vyas, Addl. GP a/w Ms. S.R. Crasto, AGP for Respondent/ State. Adv. Mamta Omle i/b Adv. Y.R. Mishra for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JANUARY 15, 2025 P. C.
Not on Board. Mentioned. With the consent of parties taken on Board. JANUARY 15, 2025 Mansi shelke
4-wp-2211-2024.doc
The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that in light of the enactment of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, whereby subsection (5) of Sect
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.