Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation LTD vs. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader And Ors
Original PDF →Facts
The Petitioner, Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court. The Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The reason for withdrawal was the Petitioner's intention to avail benefits under Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017. The Respondent was the State of Maharashtra, represented by the Government Pleader and others. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned.
Held
The Court held that the Writ Petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. This decision was based on the statement made by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, who confirmed instructions to withdraw the petition. The Petitioner's stated reason for withdrawal was to avail the benefits provided under Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court accepted this statement and accordingly dismissed the petition. No order as to costs was made. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the applicability of Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017, as the matter was resolved by the withdrawal.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the Writ Petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. The Petitioner argued that they wished to avail the benefit of Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017, and therefore sought to withdraw the petition. The Respondent, the State of Maharashtra, did not appear to contest the withdrawal. The Court had to decide whether to permit the withdrawal of the petition based on the Petitioner's stated intention.
Sections Cited
Section 128A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
sr.2-wp-4181-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4181 OF 2025 Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra thr. Govt. Pleader & Ors. .. Respondents Adv. Kiran Chavan i/b Cenex Legal LLP for the Petitioner. Ms. S. D. Vyas Addl. GP a/w. Mr. Aditya Deolekar AGP for Respondents/ State.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: MARCH 25, 2025 P. C.
The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that she has instructions to withdraw the above Writ Petition as the Petitioner seeks to avail the benefit under Section 128 A of the CGST Act, 2017. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement, the above Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. MARCH 25, 2025 Mansi shelke TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2025.03.25 18:57:15 +0530
sr.2-wp-4181-2025.doc
This order will be Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] MARCH 25, 2025 Mansi shelke
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.