Ratnadeep Enterprises vs. Additional / Joint Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise Commissionerate, Nashik And Ors

WP/13118/2024HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01042641202423 September 2025Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court granted the Petitioner, Ratnadeep Enterprises, leave to withdraw the writ petition. The withdrawal was permitted with the liberty to appeal the impugned order dated 28 May 2024. The Court directed that if the appeal is instituted within four weeks from the date of uploading of the order, the Appellate Authority should consider it on its merits without considering the issue of limitation. Since the Court did not advert to the merits of the matter, all contentions raised in the writ petition were left open. The petition was disposed of with these specific terms.

Facts

The Petitioner, Ratnadeep Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 28 May 2024. The Respondent was the Additional/Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Nashik, along with other authorities. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to the writ petition was not elaborated upon, other than the existence of the impugned order.

Key Issues

The Court was not required to decide any substantive issues of law or fact as the Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. Therefore, no specific questions of law or mixed law and fact were framed by the Court. The Petitioner's contention was to withdraw the petition with liberty to appeal the impugned order. The Respondents did not present any arguments as the matter was withdrawn at an early stage. No authorities, circulars, or precedents were relied upon by either party in the context of the Court's decision.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

902-WP-13118-2024.DOCX Chaitanya IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 13118 OF 2024 Ratnadeep Enterprises … Petitioner Versus Additional/Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Nashik And Ors. … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Bhavik Chheda i/b Mr. Nikhil M. Pujari, for Petitioner. Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Mr. Rupesh Dubey, for Respondents. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Advait M. Sethna, JJ. DATED : 23 September 2025 P.C.:-

1.

After the matter was argued for some time, Mr. Walve, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to appeal the impugned order dated 28 May 2024. 2. Accordingly, leave is granted.

3.

If the Appeal is instituted within four weeks from the date of uploading of this order, the Appellate Authority should consider the same on merits without adverting to the CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2025.09.24 16:31:00 +0530

902-WP-13118-2024.DOCX issue of limitation.

4.

Since we have not adverted t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.