Divine Connection Foundation vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Division Vi Thane And Ors

Original PDF →
WP/2472/2025HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01007967202515 April 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, Divine Connection Foundation, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order or action by the Deputy Commissioner (CGST) Division-VI Thane and other respondents. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not detailed. The matter was listed for hearing before a Division Bench of the High Court.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner, Divine Connection Foundation, to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as may be available. All contentions of the parties were expressly kept open. The Court further directed that if the petitioner files fresh proceedings within four weeks from the date of the order, such proceedings should be considered without any objection to limitation, acknowledging the bona fide pursuit of the present proceedings. No specific findings were made on the merits of the original dispute, as the petition was withdrawn.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue an alternative remedy. The respondents' stance on this request is not explicitly recorded, but the Court ultimately allowed the withdrawal. No specific questions of law or mixed law and fact were formally framed or argued as the petition was withdrawn at an early stage. The Court's decision was based on the petitioner's request for withdrawal and the liberty sought.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

19-WP 2472-25.DOC Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2472 OF 2025 Divine Connection Foundation ...Petitioner Vs. Deputy Commissioner (CGST) Division-VI Thane & Ors. ...Respondents _________ Mr. Sham Walve, Mr. Bhavik Chedda, Mr. Anupam Dighe, Ms. Ruhi Konuri and Ms. Renita Alex i/b. India Law Alliance for the Petitioner. Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondents. __________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 15 APRIL 2026. P.C.

1.

After this petition was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as may be available.

2.

Allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Disposed of. No costs.

3.

All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

4.

In the event that such proceedings are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the same be considered without any objection to the limitation on the ground that the petitioner was pursuing the present proceedings bona fide. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) 15 April 2026

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.